The brief sounds achievable. The early sketches look great. The architect’s enthusiasm is contagious. Then the build numbers come back from a builder several months later, and the project either gets descoped beyond recognition or stops dead.
This is by far the most common way Auckland projects fail. Not because the design wasn’t good. Not because the homeowner didn’t know what they wanted. Because nobody checked, at the start, whether the project as briefed was actually buildable on that section, at that budget, under current planning rules.
Feasibility prevents that. It’s a deliberately upstream conversation — site, title, zone, brief, budget, current code requirements, indicative build cost — that happens before any drawings are commissioned. By the end of it, you know whether to proceed, what to adjust, or whether to walk away with your design fees still in your pocket.










